Archive for October, 2009

October 29

$42,000 in fines against New Balance Athletic Shoe for electrical safety hazards at Lawrence, MA plant

Posted by Hugh Hoagland
Filed under Arc Flash/Shock Safety, OSHA Fines for Electrical Safety, OSHA Issues | No Comments

Here is a straightforward NFPA 70E issue. Unqualified workers doing energized work. No PPE and no training. From the OSHA allegations this one is in need. Read the OSHA press release…

October 29

OSHA seeks input on Combustible Dust Standard

Posted by Hugh Hoagland
Filed under Arc Flash/Shock Safety, Combustible Dust Explosions | No Comments

Now is the opportunity to put in testimony to OSHA on combustible dust. If more than 10 minutes will be needed it must be submitted in writing beforehand. See the NWI article… See the OSHA e-docket…

October 29

Electrocution huge issue in developing world see story in India where electrocution is almost the number 1 killer.

Posted by Hugh Hoagland
Filed under Arc Flash/Shock Safety, Public Electrical Safety | No Comments

The lack of work standards in many countries and the lack of health and safety training can be a killer. Proper wiring makes a big difference and NEC (NFPA 70), NESC (IEEE C-2) and IEC wiring standards make a big difference but local regulation is critical. See the article about ONE province in India with [...]

October 29

Arc Flash (No workers present) shuts down MARC with electrical fire.

Posted by Hugh Hoagland
Filed under Underground Network Incidents | No Comments

Workers have to work these lines often energized. It is important that this work is done properly because of the high energy levels. New PPE and procedures are pretty amazing. Read the report.

October 29

Arc flash (no workers present) in underground rail network

Posted by Hugh Hoagland
Filed under Electric Utility Incidents, Underground Network Incidents | No Comments

These are more common than I had expected. Interesting often no workers are present. See BART system shut down by an arc flash.

October 29

Virtual reality training for arc flash and shock and NFPA 70E at the NSC.

Posted by Hugh Hoagland
Filed under Arc Flash/Shock Safety, New Safety Products, Seminars and Webinars | No Comments

Etcetera Edutainment, a Pittsburgh-based provider of simulation and game-based safety training, earlier this month announced the release of “Electrical Safety Sim: Low Voltage”–a simulation-based training module that allows workers to learn and practice the principles of NFPA- and OSHA-based electrical safety.

October 26

Arc Flash Safety Training in South Africa from e-Hazard Subsidiary

Posted by Hugh Hoagland
Filed under Arc Flash/Shock Safety, Seminars and Webinars | No Comments

Zarheer Jooma, Electrical Engineer in South Africa has teamed with e-Hazard.com to provide the most up-to-date arc flash safety training in South Africa. See the editorial..

October 26

Arc Flash and Combustible Dust issues tied together in Imperial Sugar Incident

Posted by Hugh Hoagland
Filed under Arc Flash/Shock Safety, OSHA Issues | No Comments

Intresting how combustible dust and poor electrical maintenance (resulting in arc flash potentials which can ignite combustible dust). Why didn’t the Chemical Safety Board recognize that flame resistant clothing should be part of the solution? I commend CSB’s other findings but can’t understand why folks won’t see that adding one PPE item could save $millions [...]

October 23

OSHA citation of CT company mostly electrical hazards.

Posted by Hugh Hoagland
Filed under Arc Flash/Shock Safety, OSHA Fines for Electrical Safety, OSHA Issues | No Comments

I think we are seeing a trend. OSHA has more tools and training on electrical than ever before. Electrical incidents are still the #4 killer and the most likely for workers to be ignorant of. See the OSHA press release…

October 23

OSHA requires high visibility apparel for highway construction workers, does this apply to others working on roadside?

Posted by Hugh Hoagland
Filed under New Safety Products | No Comments

This is a major change from previous governmental requirements which only required it for flaggers. Read the OSHA press release…