<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Electrical and Arc Flash Safety &#187; Arc Flash Fines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://electricalarcflashsafety.com/category/arc-flash-fines/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://electricalarcflashsafety.com</link>
	<description>Your resource for the latest info about electrical and arc flash training and safety.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 20:55:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Three California men injured in electrical explosion</title>
		<link>http://electricalarcflashsafety.com/2011/11/three-california-men-injured-in-electrical-explosion/</link>
		<comments>http://electricalarcflashsafety.com/2011/11/three-california-men-injured-in-electrical-explosion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 21:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hugh Hoagland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arc Flash Fines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arc Flash/Shock Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electric Utility Incidents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Underground Network Incidents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arc flash burns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arc Flash clothing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arc flash safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrical safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NESC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://electricalarcflashsafety.com/?p=2969</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Three men were injured after a transformer exploded while they were replacing an above ground power vault.   One of the injured is an employee of Anaheim Public Utilities and the other two were under contract with the City of Anaheim. All three were hospitalized.  Police report that their clothing caught fire in the explosion. Oct. 26, 2011 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Three men were injured after a transformer exploded while they were replacing an above ground power vault.   One of the injured is an employee of Anaheim Public Utilities and the other two were under contract with the City of Anaheim. All three were hospitalized.  Police report that their clothing caught fire in the explosion. Oct. 26, 2011<br />
<!-- start of ad tag --></p>
<p><a href="http://www.ocregister.com/news/fire-323866-supervisor-injured.html" target="_blank">Click here to read more about California electrical explosion</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://electricalarcflashsafety.com/2011/11/three-california-men-injured-in-electrical-explosion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>North London Employee Severely Burned in Arc Flash Explosion. Company Fined £10,000</title>
		<link>http://electricalarcflashsafety.com/2011/10/north-london-employee-severely-burned-in-arc-flash-explosion-company-fined-10000/</link>
		<comments>http://electricalarcflashsafety.com/2011/10/north-london-employee-severely-burned-in-arc-flash-explosion-company-fined-10000/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 14:18:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hugh Hoagland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arc Flash Fines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arc Flash/Shock Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OSHA Electrical Safety Interpretations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arc blast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arc flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arc flash burns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arc Flash clothing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arc flash safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrical safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OSHA Electrical Fines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://electricalarcflashsafety.com/?p=1812</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The employee was working as a subcontractor at a construction site when the incident occurred.    The explosion was caused when a main electrical supply cable to the site was cut during its removal.  A 415 volt three-phase temporary supply had been provided to the site. The Court heard that the worker approached his supervisor to explain that the electrical [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The employee was working as a subcontractor at a construction site when the incident occurred.    The explosion was caused when a main electrical supply cable to the site was cut during its removal.  A 415 volt three-phase temporary supply had been provided to the site. The Court heard that the worker approached his supervisor to explain that the electrical cable would need to be removed before work ensued.  The Health Safety Executive investigaion revealed that the company did little to determine if the cable was live.   The workers then proceeded with removing the cable under the assumption that it must have been an old cable from a pre-existing installation.</p>
<p>The worker climbed a ladder and attempted to move the cable with a hammer and chisel.  An arc flash occurred and the worker was taken to the hospital with burns over 30% of his body.  He underwent numerous skin grafts and is expected to take two years for him to recover.  The company pleaded guilty to breaching a Section of the Health and Safety at Work Act and was fined  £10,000 and ordered to pay costs of £4,183.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.hazardexonthenet.net/article/45088/Worker-suffers-severe-burns-from-electrical-explosion.aspx?AreaID=2" target="_blank">Click here to read more about the Arc Flash Incident</p>
<p></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://electricalarcflashsafety.com/2011/10/north-london-employee-severely-burned-in-arc-flash-explosion-company-fined-10000/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rehabilitation of Apprentice Lineman Badly Burned in 2010 Maine Electric Incident</title>
		<link>http://electricalarcflashsafety.com/2011/03/rehabilitation-of-apprentice-lineman-badly-burned-in-2010-maine-electric-incident/</link>
		<comments>http://electricalarcflashsafety.com/2011/03/rehabilitation-of-apprentice-lineman-badly-burned-in-2010-maine-electric-incident/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 20:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hugh Hoagland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arc Flash Fines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arc Flash/Shock Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electric Utility Incidents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OSHA Fines for Arc Flash Incident]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OSHA Fines for Electrical Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OSHA Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Substation Incidents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arc flash burns]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://electricalarcflashsafety.com/?p=1498</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A 25 year-old apprentice lineman badly burned over 50% of his body in an electrical incident in October 2010 is continuing his rehabilitation.  The lineman was operating a scissor lift at an electrical substation when electricity arced and touched the corner of the lift. The electricity traveled to the ground and back, resulting in severe burns. Without electrical [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A 25 year-old apprentice lineman badly burned over 50% of his body in an electrical incident in October 2010 is continuing his rehabilitation.  The lineman was operating a scissor lift at an electrical substation when electricity arced and touched the corner of the lift. The electricity traveled to the ground and back, resulting in severe burns. Without electrical safety equipment, it is speculated that the incident would have resulted in his death. OSHA has investigated and the company is conducting refresher safety training.  Arc flashes resulting in &gt;25% body burns usually means the clothing ignited or the arc tracked on the sweat on the body.  If clothing ignition played a role, arc rated daily wear could have prevented most or all of the burns.  No word of OSHA fines at this point but this is likely an arc flash.  Most utilities are using arc rated daily wear.  If it is provided, wear it.  It makes all the difference in the world.</p>
<p><a href="http://new.bangordailynews.com/2011/03/15/news/aroostook/%E2%80%98an-awesome-patient%E2%80%99-mars-hill-man-badly-burned-in-electrical-accident-battles-back-to-health/?ref=latest" target="_blank">Click here to read more about Lineman&#8217;s Rehabilitation Following Electrical Incident</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://electricalarcflashsafety.com/2011/03/rehabilitation-of-apprentice-lineman-badly-burned-in-2010-maine-electric-incident/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OSHA Fines $10K+ for Arc Flash Incident in SC</title>
		<link>http://electricalarcflashsafety.com/2010/11/osha-fines-10k-for-arc-flash-incident-in-sc/</link>
		<comments>http://electricalarcflashsafety.com/2010/11/osha-fines-10k-for-arc-flash-incident-in-sc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 16:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hugh Hoagland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arc Flash Fines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arc Flash Training Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arc Flash/Shock Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OSHA Issues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://electricalarcflashsafety.com/?p=1204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OSHA has issued 5 citations and levied $10,875 in fines on  a Graniteville, SC company following  an investigation of an arc flash incident that resulted in second degree burns to three employees. The accident occurred when an employee was installing new wire conduit and breakers into a 480 V breaker box. The panel did not [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OSHA has issued 5 citations and levied $10,875 in fines on  a Graniteville, SC company following  an investigation of an arc flash incident that resulted in second degree burns to three employees. The accident occurred when an employee was installing new wire conduit and breakers into a 480 V breaker box. The panel did not have a cover in place and was live as it supplied power to a manufacturing line. </p>
<p>OSHA citations included failing to provide insulated tools, proper PPE not provided, employee not qualified to perform the electrical work,  electrical safe work practices and procedures not provided and proper training not provided for the involved employees.  OSHA has offered an interpretation letter that following NFPA 70E puts companies in compliance with OSHA electrical safety regulations.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=INTERPRETATIONS&amp;p_id=24617" target="_blank">Click here to read the OSHA Interpretation Letter pointing to NFPA 70E for compliance options for OSHA electrical safety compliance.</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.wrdw.com/home/headlines/OSHA_completes_investigation_of_MCA_Media_accident_106960329.html" target="_blank">Click here to read more about the OSHA fines for SC arc flash accident</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://electricalarcflashsafety.com/2010/11/osha-fines-10k-for-arc-flash-incident-in-sc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Snyder, OK Arc Flash Fatality of Electrical Contractor in Martin Marietta Mine.</title>
		<link>http://electricalarcflashsafety.com/2010/10/snyder-ok-arc-flash-fatality-of-electrical-contractor-in-martin-marietta-mine/</link>
		<comments>http://electricalarcflashsafety.com/2010/10/snyder-ok-arc-flash-fatality-of-electrical-contractor-in-martin-marietta-mine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 21:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hugh Hoagland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arc Flash Fines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arc Flash/Shock Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OSHA Fines for Arc Flash Incident]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arc flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arc flash burns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arc flash fatality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arc flash safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrical fatality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrical safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSHA Electrical Safety Requirements]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://electricalarcflashsafety.com/?p=1077</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On October 10, 2010 three electrical contractor employees working at the Martin Marietta Mine in Snyder, OK were arc flashed installing ground fault indicator lights on a live 800 AMP breaker.  From the MSHA report, all three workers were transported to the hospital and one died two days later.  Most of the arc flash fatalities are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On October 10, 2010 three electrical contractor employees working at the Martin Marietta Mine in Snyder, OK were arc flashed installing ground fault indicator lights on a live 800 AMP breaker.  From the MSHA report, all three workers were transported to the hospital and one died two days later.  Most of the <a href="http://www.e-hazard.com/classes/low_voltage_qualified.php" target="_blank">arc flash fatalities </a>are from ignition of clothing in the arc flash.  Companies should include the need for <a href="http://arcwear.com" target="_blank">tested, arc rated clothing </a>in the <a href="http://www.e-hazard.com/classes/low_voltage_qualified.php" target="_blank">arc flash training </a>portion of their <a href="http://www.e-hazard.com/classes/low_voltage_qualified.php" target="_blank">electrical safety training</a>.  <a href="http://www.e-hazard.com/program_development.php" target="_blank">Written electrical safety programs </a>require <a href="http://www.e-hazard.com/arc_flash_studies.php" target="_blank">hazard assessment including arc flash hazards</a>.</p>
<p>MSHA requires following NFPA 70E, Standard for Electrical Safety in the Workplace.  Most of these types of injuries and fatalities are avoidable.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.e-hazard.com/MSHA-Arc-Flash-Fatality-10-12-10.pdf" target="_blank">Click here to see the MSHA incident report of an Arc Flash Fatality</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://electricalarcflashsafety.com/2010/10/snyder-ok-arc-flash-fatality-of-electrical-contractor-in-martin-marietta-mine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Aberdeen Scotland Electrical Explosion (Arc Flash) Results in £9,000 Fine</title>
		<link>http://electricalarcflashsafety.com/2010/09/aberdeen-scotland-electrical-explosion-arc-flash-results-in-9000-fine/</link>
		<comments>http://electricalarcflashsafety.com/2010/09/aberdeen-scotland-electrical-explosion-arc-flash-results-in-9000-fine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Sep 2010 19:22:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hugh Hoagland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arc Flash Fines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OSHA Fines for Arc Flash Incident]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OSHA Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arc flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arc flash burns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arc flash safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrical safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFPA 70E]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://electricalarcflashsafety.com/?p=1001</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["
Building firm fined after electrical blast
By Catriona Webster

Published: 03/09/2010

An Aberdeen building firm was fined £9,000 yesterday after an employee was badly burned in an electrical explosion.

Sheriff James Tierney ordered the owners of Graeme W. Cheyne (Builders) Ltd to pay an additional £4,000 in compensation to joiner George Forbes at a hearing at Aberdeen Sheriff Court.

The company, of Sugarhouse Lane, previously admitted health and safety failures that led to Mr Forbes, 62, handling a redundant electricity power supply device known as a fuse cut-out that was still live.

Mr Forbes was working on a construction site at 238-242 Holburn Street on November 11, 2008, when he tried to remove the fuse cut-out to put up some plasterboard.

The cut-out was connected to a 415-volt cable and Mr Forbes was badly burned when he touched it.

He was taken to Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, where he stayed for nine days and was treated for burns to his hand and face.

A Health and Safety Executive (HSE) investigation revealed that the cable was twisted, causing a short-circuit that created enough energy to melt the cable and create a small explosion.



Read more: http://www.pressandjournal.co.uk/Article.aspx/1900622?UserKey=#ixzz10ZRkPX1K"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>415V cutout was live when worker touched it.  Rubber insulating gloves, test before touch and many other proper work practices could have prevented this injury.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.pressandjournal.co.uk/Article.aspx/1900622?UserKey=" target="_blank">Read the full article on this Scotland arc flash injury at the Press and Journal</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://electricalarcflashsafety.com/2010/09/aberdeen-scotland-electrical-explosion-arc-flash-results-in-9000-fine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PG&amp;E Fined $176,000 over Utility Worker&#8217;s Fatal Electrocution</title>
		<link>http://electricalarcflashsafety.com/2010/09/pge-fined-176000-over-utility-workers-fatal-electrocution/</link>
		<comments>http://electricalarcflashsafety.com/2010/09/pge-fined-176000-over-utility-workers-fatal-electrocution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Sep 2010 15:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hugh Hoagland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arc Flash Fines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electric Shock Incidents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electric Utility Incidents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OSHA Fines for Arc Flash Incident]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OSHA Fines for Electrical Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OSHA Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Underground Network Incidents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrical fatality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrical safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrocution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OSHA Electrical Safety Requirements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shock]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://electricalarcflashsafety.com/?p=1110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The California Department of Industrial Relations has levied a $176,000 fine on Pacific Gas &#38; Electric following a review of a Cal-OSHA report that alleged lax enforcement of safety rules to protect employees following the electrocution death of a PG&#38;E utility worker.  The worker was upgrading a transformer in a vault that contained 12,000-volt power lines.  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The California Department of Industrial Relations has levied a $176,000 fine on Pacific Gas &amp; Electric following a review of a Cal-OSHA report that alleged lax enforcement of safety rules to protect employees following the electrocution death of a PG&amp;E utility worker.  The worker was upgrading a transformer in a vault that contained 12,000-volt power lines.  The worker was unable to be revived and died at the scene of  the accident.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.insidebayarea.com/crime-courts/ci_16104512?source=rss" target="_blank">Click here to read more about the accident at PG&amp;E</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://electricalarcflashsafety.com/2010/09/pge-fined-176000-over-utility-workers-fatal-electrocution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The USPS Electrical Safety Problem Began in Kansas City, MO</title>
		<link>http://electricalarcflashsafety.com/2010/09/the-usps-electrical-safety-problem-began-in-kansas-city-mo/</link>
		<comments>http://electricalarcflashsafety.com/2010/09/the-usps-electrical-safety-problem-began-in-kansas-city-mo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2010 02:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hugh Hoagland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arc Flash Fines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEC Related Wiring Fines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OSHA Fines for Electrical Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OSHA Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arc flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arc flash safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arc flash training]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OSHA Electrical Fines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://electricalarcflashsafety.com/?p=982</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["In addition to proposing a $191,000 penalty for the Kansas City, Kan., facility, the Labor Department’s complaint asks the independent Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission to order the Postal Service to correct electrical violations at all of its facilities nationwide.

The Postal Service responded that it has been working since January to correct many of the electrical safety issues.

“The plan provides for electrical risk assessments, training, personal protective equipment, enhanced safe electrical work practices and insulated tools,” the Postal Service said in a prepared statement.

The response already has included 123,000 hours of training for more than 20,000 maintenance employees and continuing distribution of more than $2 million in protective gear such as safety glasses, face shields and flame-resistant gloves, lab coats and coveralls. 

The Labor Department said the complaint “marks the first time OSHA has sought enterprise-wide relief as a remedy.”


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The quote below indicates someone still doesn&#8217;t understand NFPA 70E.  Using labcoats doesn&#8217;t comply with the standard and is typically a poor choice for electrical safety.  Why flame resistant gloves mentioned and no rubber gloves (unless they already had them in place).  Leather would have probably been a better choice on arc flash gloves.  Depends on the leather but leather could have saved them millions system-wide.  Good to see them improving the program.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.kansascity.com/2010/08/25/2175945/kck-postal-centers-problems-spur.html" target="_blank">Click here to read the whole story on KS USPS Processing Facility OSHA Electrical Fines.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://electricalarcflashsafety.com/2010/09/the-usps-electrical-safety-problem-began-in-kansas-city-mo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DOE Imposes $1.2 Million &#8220;reduction of fees&#8221; on Bechtel in Arc Flash Event at Oak Ridge Lab</title>
		<link>http://electricalarcflashsafety.com/2010/07/doe-imposes-1-2-million-reduction-of-fees-on-bechtel-in-arc-flash-event-at-oak-ridge-lab/</link>
		<comments>http://electricalarcflashsafety.com/2010/07/doe-imposes-1-2-million-reduction-of-fees-on-bechtel-in-arc-flash-event-at-oak-ridge-lab/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 14:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hugh Hoagland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arc Flash Fines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Overhead line incidents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arc flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arc flash safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrical safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrocution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OSHA Electrical Fines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://electricalarcflashsafety.com/?p=891</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DOE is one of the toughest on electrical safety.  Bechtel has a good rep too.  Shows improvements can happen anywhere and that programs can slip when training slips. Click here to read the story about an arc flash in the Knoxville News Sentinel.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DOE is one of the toughest on electrical safety.  Bechtel has a good rep too.  Shows improvements can happen anywhere and that programs can slip when training slips.</p>
<p><a href="http://license.icopyright.net/user/viewFreeUse.act?fuid=OTE2MDU5Mg" target="_blank">Click here to read the story about an arc flash in the Knoxville News Sentinel.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://electricalarcflashsafety.com/2010/07/doe-imposes-1-2-million-reduction-of-fees-on-bechtel-in-arc-flash-event-at-oak-ridge-lab/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arc Flash Citation $22K by OH&amp;S in Saskatoon.  CSA Z462 could have prevented the incident.</title>
		<link>http://electricalarcflashsafety.com/2010/06/arc-flash-citation-22k-by-ohs-in-saskatoon-csa-z462-could-have-prevented-the-incident/</link>
		<comments>http://electricalarcflashsafety.com/2010/06/arc-flash-citation-22k-by-ohs-in-saskatoon-csa-z462-could-have-prevented-the-incident/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 16:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hugh Hoagland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arc Flash Fines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arc Flash/Shock Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OSHA Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arc flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arc flash burns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arc Flash clothing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arc flash safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arc flash saftey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSA Z462]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFPA 70E]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://electricalarcflashsafety.com/?p=850</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wearing the right PPE is critical but other provisions to prevent arc flashes and lower incident energies in incidents are part of CSA Z462 and NFPA 70E.  These provisions prevent many of the incidents in the workplace. Click here to read the story of the arc flash fine in Canada at OH&#38;S Insider.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wearing the right PPE is critical but other provisions to prevent arc flashes and lower incident energies in incidents are part of CSA Z462 and NFPA 70E.  These provisions prevent many of the incidents in the workplace.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ohsinsider.com/legal-landscape-cases/arc-flash-incident-costs-company-22000" target="_blank">Click here to read the story of the arc flash fine in Canada at OH&amp;S Insider.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://electricalarcflashsafety.com/2010/06/arc-flash-citation-22k-by-ohs-in-saskatoon-csa-z462-could-have-prevented-the-incident/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

