Archive for the ‘OSHA Issues’ Category

August 6

Kleen Energy Explosion Citations of $16 Million in Fines include NEC “Listing” Violations

Posted by Hugh Hoagland
Filed under Electric Utility Incidents, NEC Related Wiring Fines, OSHA Issues, Power plant incidents | No Comments

Kleen Energy explosion included “Citations …for failing to install & use electrical equipment in accordance with its listing and labeling.”  OSHA and the NEC (NFPA 70) which is law in most states require electrical equipment be used in accordance with its listing and labeling.  It is all to common to find citations on this even in new [...]

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Blogplay
  • Twitter
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • RSS
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz

July 30

OSHA proposes $420,000 in fines against US Postal Service Processing Facility in Vermont

Posted by Hugh Hoagland
Filed under OSHA Fines for Electrical Safety, OSHA Issues | No Comments

This citation raises the stakes against the USPS to almost $4 million in fines.  I’m very sure this will NOT be paid in full.  Just a strong message to USPS and others that electrical hazards and training are important. 
Recently I have found that the USPS does have arc flash labels available in house that are [...]

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Blogplay
  • Twitter
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • RSS
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz

July 29

Widespread … electrical hazards at Eastford, Conn., Whitcraft Aircraft Parts Manufacturer

Posted by Hugh Hoagland
Filed under NEC Related Wiring Fines, OSHA Fines for Electrical Safety, OSHA Issues | No Comments

OSHA cited Whitcraft LLC for 44 alleged serious violations of workplace standards at its Eastford, Conn., aircraft parts manufacturing plant.
OSHA said, “These sizable fines reflect the breadth and gravity of the hazardous conditions identified during our inspection at this workplace, conditions which should not have existed in the first place,”
The “electrical hazards including misused electrical [...]

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Blogplay
  • Twitter
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • RSS
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz

July 26

Disney Employee Electrocuted Working with Temporary Transformer

Posted by Hugh Hoagland
Filed under Electric Shock Incidents, OSHA Issues | No Comments

A Disney vetran, age 50, was electrocuted on a job he had been shocked on before according to the news report.  He had been shocked because of inexperienced workers in the past according to his wife’s news report.
Most of these fatalities are preventable.  Doesn’t look like any equipment failure.  Looked like “deenergized work” that became [...]

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Blogplay
  • Twitter
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • RSS
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz

July 22

OSHA fines $130K CT EDAC Tech for “electrical safety deficiencies,… & workers not trained in electrical safety”

Posted by Hugh Hoagland
Filed under OSHA Fines for Electrical Safety, OSHA Issues | No Comments

This type of fine is happening more than one per week.  There are so many options for electrical safety training and arc flash training today.  Most companies have multiskilled technicians who need training too.  Too many companies want to spend 2 days on OSHA regulations when 1 day of a full class understanding OSHA and [...]

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Blogplay
  • Twitter
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • RSS
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz

July 20

Am I Responsible for Other Employer’s Electrical Cords on a Construction Site? OSHA Says, “You Could Be.”

Posted by Hugh Hoagland
Filed under OSHA Electrical Safety Interpretations, OSHA Issues | No Comments

Multi-employer sites don’t get “buys”.  Being vigilant is the key.  Document other’s violations and work together for a safe workplace.  We are only as good as our weakest link.
Click here to read the recent OSHA Interpretation on Multi-employer responsibility for electrical cords on construction sites.

Share and Enjoy:

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Blogplay
  • Twitter
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • RSS
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz

July 20

Ball Jars, Kerr Jars, Diamond Matches, Java Logs maker Jarden Home Brands Cited on Electrical Safety

Posted by Hugh Hoagland
Filed under Arc Flash/Shock Safety, NEC Related Wiring Fines, OSHA Fines for Electrical Safety, OSHA Issues | No Comments

Region 6 News Release: DOL-OSHA-10-941-DAL
Monday, July 19, 2010
Contact: Elizabeth Todd
Phone: 972-850-4710
Email: todd.elizabeth@dol.gov

US Department of Labor’s OSHA cites Jarden Home Brands
in Greenville, Texas, for alleged safety violations

GREENVILLE, Texas – The U.S. Department of Labor’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration has cited Jarden Home Brands with two alleged willful and 12 alleged serious violations following a safety inspection at the company’s worksite in Greenville. Penalties total $197,500.

“This employer jeopardized the safety of its workers by exposing them to the possible release of electrical energy, which could result in electrocution or other hazards,” said Stephen Boyd, OSHA’s area director in Dallas, Texas. “OSHA’s regulations must be followed to avoid injuries and fatalities.”

OSHA’s Dallas Area Office began its inspection Jan. 27 at the company’s facility on Industrial Boulevard after receiving a referral alleging workers were being exposed to safety hazards. Willful violations were issued for failing to develop specific procedures to protect workers from the unexpected release of electrical energy, and for failing to provide adequate machine guarding for employees working around rotating shafts. A willful violation is one committed with intentional, knowing or voluntary disregard for the law’s requirements, or with plain indifference to employee safety and health.

The serious violations included failing to provide fall protection equipment, training in lockout/tagout procedures of energy sources, training in the use of forklift trucks, and ensuring electrical equipment was approved for use in hazardous locations. A serious violation is one in which there is substantial probability that death or serious physical harm could result from a hazard about which the employer knew or should have known.

Employers and employees with questions regarding workplace safety and health standards can call OSHA’s Dallas Area Office at 214-320-2400 or OSHA’s toll-free hotline at 800-321-6742 to report workplace accidents, fatalities or situations posing imminent danger to workers.

Jarden Home Brands has 15 business days from receipt of citations to comply, request an informal conference with the OSHA area director in Dallas, or contest the citations and penalties before the independent Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission.

Under the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, employers are responsible for providing safe and healthful workplaces for their employees. OSHA’s role is to assure these conditions for America’s working men and women by setting and enforcing standards, and providing training, education and assistance. For more information, visit http://www.osha.gov.

###

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Blogplay
  • Twitter
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • RSS
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz

July 20

OSHA fines Kenton Iron Products $214,500 Electrical Safety Tops the List

Posted by Hugh Hoagland
Filed under Arc Flash/Shock Safety, OSHA Fines for Electrical Safety, OSHA Issues | No Comments

Region 5 News Release: 10-982-CHI
July 16, 2010
Contact: Scott Allen
Phone: 312-353-6976
E-mail: allen.scott@dol.gov

US Labor Department’s OSHA fines Kenton Iron Products
$214,500 in penalties for 29 safety and health violations

KENTON, Ohio – The U.S. Department of Labor’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration has cited Kenton Iron Products LLC with $214,500 in proposed penalties for 29 alleged serious, willful, and repeat safety and health violations for unsafe working conditions at the company’s iron casting facility in Kenton.

As a result of a January 2010 inspection, OSHA has issued three alleged willful citations with proposed penalties of $156,000 for failing to ensure that some equipment was de-energized and shut down properly, and lockout/tagout procedures were in place before workers conducted maintenance on the equipment to prevent accidental start-up of machinery. A willful violation is one committed with intentional, knowing or voluntary disregard for the law’s requirement, or plain indifference to employee safety and health.

Twenty-two serious citations with proposed penalties of $50,700 also have been issued. These include excess amounts of flammable liquids stored in a fire area; lack of or improper capacity labeling on equipment; malfunctioning back up alarms and hydraulic leaks on equipment; failure to have and enforce electrical lockout/tagout procedures; lack of employee fall protections; lack of proper personal protective gear for workers, and unlabeled containers of hazardous chemicals. An OSHA violation is serious if death or serious physical harm can result from a hazard an employer knew or should have known exists.

Additionally, OSHA has issued $7,800 in proposed fines for three repeat violations, including failing to provide proper grounding and bonding of flammable liquids, failing to provide safety latches on material handling hooks, and using compressed air over the 30 pounds per square inch limit. OSHA issues repeat violations if that employer previously was cited for the same or similar violation of any standard, regulation, rule or order at any other facility in federal enforcement states within the last three years.

The company also has received one other-than-serious citation for using damaged electrical testing equipment. Other-than-serious citations are given when the violation would not directly cause a death or serious physical harm, but would affect the safety and health of employees.

“There is no excuse for a company to disregard the safety and welfare of its workers by not following OSHA safety standards,” said OSHA Area Director Jule Hovi in Toledo, Ohio. “Those who ignore safe practices and OSHA regulations are inviting tragedy into the lives of their workers.”

Kenton Iron Products manufactures iron castings at its two foundries located in Kenton and has more than 80 employees. The company has been inspected by OSHA 10 times since 1981 and has received 49 previous citations.

The company has 15 business days from receipt of its citations and penalties to comply, request an informal conference with OSHA’s area director or contest the findings before the independent Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission. To report workplace accidents, fatalities or situations posing imminent danger to workers, call OSHA’s toll-free hotline at 800-321-6742.

Under the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, employers are responsible for providing safe and healthful workplaces for their employees. OSHA’s role is to assure these conditions for America’s working men and women by setting and enforcing standards, and providing training, education and assistance. For more information, visit http://www.osha.gov.

###

——————————————————————————–

U.S. Department of Labor releases are accessible on the Internet at http://www.dol.gov. The information in this news release will be made available in alternate format (large print, Braille, audiotape or disc) from the COAST office upon request. Please specify which news release when placing your request at 202-693-7828 or TTY 202-693-7755. The Labor Department is committed to providing America’s employers and employees with easy access to understandable information on how to comply with its laws and regulations. For more information, please visit http://www.dol.gov/compliance.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Blogplay
  • Twitter
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • RSS
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz

July 19

DOE Imposes $1.2 Million “reduction of fees” on Bechtel in Arc Flash Event at Oak Ridge Lab

Posted by Hugh Hoagland
Filed under Arc Flash Fines, Overhead line incidents | No Comments

DOE is one of the toughest on electrical safety.  Bechtel has a good rep too.  Shows improvements can happen anywhere and that programs can slip when training slips.
Click here to read the story about an arc flash in the Knoxville News Sentinel.

Share and Enjoy:

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Blogplay
  • Twitter
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • RSS
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz

July 15

OSHA proposes >$69K in penalties against Roll-Kraft for exposing workers to electrical & other hazards

Posted by Hugh Hoagland
Filed under OSHA Fines for Electrical Safety, OSHA Issues | No Comments

“Region 5 News Release: 10-920-CHI
July 12, 2010
Contact: Scott Allen
Phone: 312-353-6976
E-mail: allen.scott@dol.gov

US Labor Department’s OSHA proposes more than $69,000 in penalties against Roll-Kraft for exposing workers to hazards

MENTOR, Ohio – The U.S. Department of Labor’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration has cited Mentor-based RKI Inc., which operates the Roll-Kraft steel manufacturing facility, with 12 alleged safety violations carrying proposed penalties of $69,650. The company has been cited for failing to properly protect workers against electrical and machine hazards, and for not providing required safety training.

OSHA has cited the company with one willful and seven serious safety violations following an inspection in January. Some of these violations include the company’s failure to provide adequate guarding on lathes, grinding and other dangerous machines; to develop and implement training on locking a machine’s energy source, and alerting others about the state of that power source; and to provide proper fire response training.

A willful violation is one committed with intentional, knowing or voluntary disregard for the law’s requirement, or plain indifference to employee safety and health. An OSHA violation is serious if death or serious physical harm can result from a hazard an employer knew or should have known exists.

The company also has received four other-than-serious violations for failing to properly record past workplace injuries.

“It is the responsibility of employers to ensure workers are provided with proper safety protection against electrical and machine hazards, and that they receive proper emergency training,” said OSHA Area Director Rob Medlock in Cleveland, Ohio. “Those who ignore these safety and health regulations are inviting tragedy into the lives of their workers.”

The company has 15 business days from receipt of its citations and penalties to comply, request an informal conference with OSHA’s area director or contest the findings before the independent Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission. To report workplace accidents, fatalities or situations posing imminent danger to workers, call OSHA’s toll-free hotline at 800-321-OSHA (6742).

Under the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, employers are responsible for providing safe and healthful workplaces for their employees. OSHA’s role is to assure these conditions for America’s working men and women by setting and enforcing standards, and providing training, education and assistance. For more information, visit http://www.osha.gov.”

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Blogplay
  • Twitter
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • RSS
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz